Que sera, sera, whatever will be, will be, but first I need more coffee.

Author: Christopher (Page 27 of 29)

This is my blog. There are many like it, but this one is mine. My blog is NOT my best friend. It is NOT my life. I do NOT have to master it as I must master my life. My blog, without me is NOT useless. It simply won't get updated. I must write my blog true, except when it serves my purposes to do otherwise. I must write better than other bloggers who are trying to outblog me. Or not.

Underpants Gnomes

That headline got your attention. The Underpants Gnomes appeared in an episode of South Park. They would steal people’s underwear. The boys find out what it’s all about:

  1. Steal underwear
  2. ????
  3. Profit

This seems to be how most companies work. I’m a big fan of capitalism. It works in practice much better than communism, but people are people. Any system can be corrupted. Capitalism is supposed to work under enlightened self-interest. Greed trumps enlightened self-interest. Greed trumps fairness. For day to day barter with your neighbors, capitalism works. What about between total strangers? It works for the most part. But what about addictive drugs?

I’m not talking about Heroin or Cocaine or even Tobacco. Well maybe I am. Don’t forget to include alcohol in the mix. I’m also going to throw prescription drugs into the mix. Most modern medications take years of studies and can be very expensive to develop. But some of them seem to be prescribed for other than it’s intended purpose. Some of it may work. But prescription drugs are like a hammer. Everything begins to look like a nail.

Anti-depressents and anti-pyschotics treat the symptoms. They don’t treat the source they don’t go after the problem. Therapy should be easier with the symptoms relieved. I get the impression that most people don’t get the therapy they need. They just pop a pill.

Profit. The drug company wants to maximize profit. So they look for other uses for their drugs. Hey if these anti-psychotic drugs are good for adults, they ought to be good for children. This may be true, but did they did do studies with the children. I don’t think you should mess with a child’s brain chemistry except under extreme circumstances. Not to sound like a Luddite, but children grew up just fine for the last 6,000 years of civilization without anti-pyschotics. Of course for most of human history, most children didn’t grow to adulthood. So let’s just choose the last century.

For the early part of the last century, children grew up just fine without anti-psychotics, anti-depressents, or anti-hyper (ADD) drugs. What about immunizations? They don’t mess with brain chemistry. Though one fraudster did attempt to cast aspersion on MMR innoculations that it caused autism. Autism is on the rise in this country. And I’ll try to address this issue.

Note – Why am I writing this essay/blog/post/entry? It’s to help me sort my thoughts out out on capitalism, marketing, drugs, autism. I suppose I could say that Greed has unintended side effects. Does Greed cause autism? I’ve written stories about the unintended consequences of new technologies. One of my childhood friends was hyperactive. One of my distant cousins is autistic. So I have some experience with these conditions.

I suppose what I’m getting at is the profit motive in the best interest of the consumer? How does he know he’s getting a fair deal. It’s all about fairness. It’s even been shown in some monkeys that the concept of fairness may be innate. They would reward some monkeys with food and others with a rock for the same task. The monkeys who got the rock were pissed and quit doing those tasks. And there is a difference between the concepts of fairness and entitlement.

Life isn’t fair, but that doesn’t mean we can’t strive to be fair. Some people have an entitlement mentality which is often confused with fairness. This is not the best example, but here goes. At a public venue like concert halls there are often long lines to the women’s toilets. They aren’t entitled to have more toilets, but it would be fair to have more toilets available to handle the traffic as quickly as the men’s toilets. OK, here’s a better example. We aren’t entitled to affordable housing, but we should have a fair housing market. We aren’t entitled to affordable prescription meds, but we should have fair pricing. Especially when some developed drugs are developed at public expense.
The consumer needs to be educated and there needs to be a level of trust between the seller and the buyer. Unfortunately, people can make a great deal of money by screwing different consumers. They have a large pool from which to draw. Profit is good. The market is pretty good at determing fair pricing, but certain commodity prices are not determined by market forces and that isn’t fair.

The most extreme example of market forces at work has to be the Irish potato famine. Other countries the Netherlands and Germany shut off food exports to stave off the worst of it. But in Ireland food was still being exported because people could pay more for it elsewhere and there were armed guards to protect the food shipments. Had Ireland done what the continental countries did the famine and exodus would have been much less severe. The next time someone tells you they want laissez-faire capitalism point to that and ask them if that’s what they mean.

Chewbacca Defense

My reasons for blogging are many. Mainly to test the waters of opinion. To see if they make sense, which they probably don’t. I may meander from idea to idea. In fact, I may jump around and change the subject alot. So, I’m reminded of the Chewbacca Defense from the South Park episode, Chef Aid.

I’m not going to use any legal arguments, just that what I say may not make any sense. I read an excellent book on writing. The author said, write for yourself, but write as though you were writing for other people. Writing for yourself is art. Writing for others is craft.

If what I write doesn’t make sense. Don’t worry about it because I don’t care. Well, not much anyway.

It’s Butanol Baby!

The world is changing. Is it getting worse? Is it getting better? It doesn’t matter. It’s changing. America has less than 6% of the world population and yet it consumes a quarter of the world’s oil supply. There is no way the rest of the world can live at American level’s of consumption. That doesn’t mean the rest of the world can’t enjoy a high standard of living. Technicallly it’s possible, but politically extremely unlikely. It would require very radical changes in the way we live and I won’t get into it here. The world population is putting extreme pressure on the biosphere. The rich countries are causing one set of problems and the poor countries are causing a different set of problems.

Where does butanol fit into all of this? I’m getting to it. To achieve sustainable living in America conservation, reuse and recycling is going to be base of our new technology. And using energy efficient technology and using renewable resources are the next step.

Ethanol as a replacement or supplement to gasoline is a scam. It has less energy, it’s corrosive, it’s a solvent, and it cannot be transported in pipelines. Why is it a scam? Most of the ethanol is going to come from corn. Forget cellulosic ethanol for a moment. Could we grown enough corn organically without subsidies, without fossil fuel based fertilizers and pesticides? Could the tractors run on biodiesel produced by the corn oil that also produce the starch that is converted to high fructose corn syrup to be fermented into ethanol? Oh and will there be enough water available to ferment. When I get to butanol water will also be an issue. I think the answer is yes, but industry won’t do it that way. They’ll continue to use fossil fuels and charge even more for ethanol it. So from a consumer standpoint it doesn’t make economic sense.

Butanol is basically organic gasoline, or rather it can be. It has almost as much energy as petrol and suffers none of the transport problems that ethanol does. It is a kind of alcohol like ethanol but is fermented from a different organism. It’s going to have some of the same drawbacks as ethanol but it’s positives outweigh ethanol’s negatives. Cars don’t have to be modified. It doesn’t absorb water like ethanol and it’s not a corrosive solvent like ethanol.

Replacing fossil fuel gasoline with organically produced butanol is a solution but not the solution. It’s only one part of the energy mix. Different solutions will depend on where you live. Things like climate and population density and driving distances will all play a factor. Places that are relatively flat with a good climate and close together would be a good place for lots of bicycles. The think globally act locally is a tired mantra but accurate.

I think the two fuels that we should move to are biodiesel and butanol for personal transportation and save the petroleum for planes and trains. The arguments in favor or biodiesel (not from soy) and organic butanol are very compelling and I think those fuels will figure very prominently for transportation in the near future. Ultimately, to have a high standard of living, we will have to radically change the way we live. Otherwise, we’ll still radically change the way we live, only we’ll have a very low standard of living.
One final comment. I’ve read of people wanting to produce hydrogen from coal. Coal is mostly carbon. So where they get the hydrogen from I don’t know. Apparently, it can be done, but it also produces lots of carbon dioxide. Needless to say on the surface this looks retarded. Hydrogen should be produced from electrolysis of water either using solar or wind energy.

You can read up on butanol and biodiesel if you like. I forgot to mention that cars, trucks should eventually be replaced with hybrids and all electric vehicles.

Hayabusa

Read this comment. Hayabusa is an unusual asteroid. It is believed to be a pile O’ rubble held together loosely with low gravity. What would happen if such an asteroid were to hit Earth? I supposed it would depend on the angle of attack. Would it break up? Would the damage be less severe if it broke up into thousands of small boulders instead of striking as one solid mass?

What are the implications for other loose pils O’ rubble in the solar system that are hazards for Earth? If a lot of asteroids are actually a pile of rubble held together loosely with low gravity how does this change the asteroid impact theory. Yes, we know there were large solid meteors that hit the Earth and made some big ass craters including causing at least one mass extinction, possibly more.

Jesus H Christ

It’s all The Da Vinci Code’s fault. Christians are up in arms over a work of fiction. Let me repeat that, a work of fiction. I haven’t seen this much protest since The Last Temptation of Christ and The Life of Brian. It’s been said there are more birth defects among Born Again Christians than any other religious group. Think about it.

Take a look at this link.
I’m going to write about The History Channels Banned from the Bible, the Gnostic Gospels, the historicity of Jesus, Biblical innerency (covering Creation and the Great Flood), the Essenes, Buddhism, Alexander the Great, and some dude named Jehoshua Ben Pandira. And I’ll write about Anguipedes.

Note – I’ve begun reviewing previous posts. I’ve noticed a number of mispelled words and poorly phrased sentences. And there are probably grammatical errors as well. I’m not going to worry about it. I may decide to go back and fix them. I’ll most likely just endeavor to write better and more carefully for future posts.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2025 Christopher Merle

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑